T145 The Environmental Geology and Geochemistry of Mineral Deposits: Best Practices for Effective Prediction, Mitigation, Closure, and Remediation (Posters)
EVALUATION OF ACID-GENERATING POTENTIAL OF COMPLEX MINE WASTES
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Authors
-
R. SealU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Nadine M. PiatakU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
-
Jane M. HammarstromReston, VA
Abstract
XRD showed removal of jarosite by boiled concentrated HCl, by Na2CO3, and by NaOH; of pyrrhotite by boiled concentrated HCl; and of gypsum by boiled concentrated HCl, by Na2CO3, and by HNO3. Incomplete removal of gypsum was seen following dilute HCl and NaOH treatments. In samples with high pyrite content, pyrite persisted throughout all the leaches, though a decrease in sulfur concentration was seen in samples treated with HNO3. It is possible, therefore, to distinguish the sulfides pyrite and pyrrhotite through a boiled concentrated HCl leach and to separate these sulfides from sulfates such as jarosite and gypsum through a Na2CO3 leach. Gypsum and jarosite may be differentiated through a HNO3 leach. These results suggest that current widely accepted ABA protocols may yield inaccurate results depending upon the mineralogy of mine wastes. Interpretation of ABA results can be improved through mineralogical studies of mine wastes and through modifications to leaching protocols.