T237 Noble and Trace Gas Geochemistry: Practical Applications and Current Research
Wednesday, 3 November 2010
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 207
RECONNAISSANCE OF 3He/4He IN CALIFORNIA GROUNDWATER
Paper number: T237-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:30 AM – 8:45 AM
Authors
-
Kenneth BelitzEarth System Processes Division, Carlisle, MA
-
Brad K. EsserLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA
-
Darren J. HillegondsLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA
Abstract
Nonparametric statistics were used to test for correlations between 3He/4He and potential explanatory factors. The correlation between 3He/4He and the categorical explanatory factors: rock type (sedimentary, plutonic, volcanic), geologic Era (Cenozoic, Mesozoic, pre-Mesozoic), Cenozoic age (Holocene, Pleistocene, Tertiary), and Cenozoic sediment type (alluvium, glacial, marine, non-marine, sand, volcanic) were evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The Spearman’s method was used to establish correlation between the continuous variables 3He/4He and the distance of a well to the nearest fault.
Statistical tests demonstrate that 3He/4He had a significant positive correlation to the proximity of a well to faults. There also are significant differences in 3He/4He between the following categorical factors: higher in volcanic than in plutonic rocks; higher in plutonic than in sedimentary rocks; higher in Cenozoic than Mesozoic rocks; and higher in pre-Mesozoic than Mesozoic rocks.
These results, higher 3He/4He in wells located in volcanics and rocks of Cenozoic age, may be explained by mantle 3He from relatively recent magmatic activity. The increase of 3He/4He near faults suggests seismic activity as a source of 3He. Other statistical comparisons revealed no significant correlations.
Identifying the factors that explain the spatial variations in 3He/4He is the first step towards characterizing groundwater affected by seismic activity, 3He from tritium decay, long residence times, and crustal degassing.