T148 Reconstructing Supercontinents and the Global Large Igneous Province (LIP) Record
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 102D-F
CONSTRAINTS ON NEOPROTEROZOIC INTRAPLATE MAGMATISM IN THE KALAHARI CRATON: GEOCHRONOLOGY AND PALEOMAGNETISM OF ~890-795 MA EXTENSION-RELATED IGNEOUS ROCKS IN SW NAMIBIA AND ADJACENT PARTS OF SOUTH AFRICA
Paper number: T148-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:30 AM – 9:45 AM
Authors
-
David L. ReidCape Town, N/A
-
Matthew RiouxMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
-
Samuel A. BowringMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
-
Wulf A. GoseUniversity of Texas, Austin, TX
-
L. Taylor BartholomewTexas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX
-
Taylor M. KilianYale University, New Haven, CT
-
David A.D. EvansYale University, New Haven, CT
-
Joseph PanzikYale University, New Haven, CT
-
Karl Heinz HoffmannWindhoek, N/A
Abstract
We have obtained single-crystal U-Pb ID-TIMS zircon ages of ~890-880 Ma for granite and syenite within the largest RS plutonic complexes (Sjambok River and Older Bremen complexes) and for a NE-trending felsic swarm associated with the Older Bremen complex. Frimmel et al. (2001, Jour. Geol.) reported U-Pb zircon ages of ~830 and 800 Ma for two other igneous centers (Rooiberg and Klipbokkop) near the SW limit of the RS. New single-grain zircon and baddeleyite data from the largest dike in the GDS yield dates of ~795 Ma (this study; Rioux et al., 2010, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.). These data indicate that intraplate felsic magmatism lasted for ~90 Ma and was followed closely by emplacement of the GDS.
An initial paleomagnetic data set from the RS and parts of the GDS yielded a single high-latitude pole (74o N, 234o E, n = 36, A95 = 4.5o) and included sites giving the dates mentioned above. The large differences in crystallization ages between these units suggest that the older sites were remagnetized during emplacement of the GDS. Ongoing work on additional GDS sites from other sampling areas yields distinctly different directions, suggesting that some of the dikes were emplaced at significantly different times; additional geochronological work is in progress to resolve this issue.