T85 Advances in Characterization of Groundwater Flow Processes
Monday, 10 October 2011
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room M101AB
INTEGRATED HELICOPTER ELECTROMAGNETIC AND BOREHOLE INTERPRETATION OF AQUIFERS IN ALLUVIAL VALLEYS AND UNDER DISSECTED TILL PLAINS, NEBRASKA, USA
Paper number: T85-14
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 11:20 AM – 11:35 AM
Authors
-
Jesse T. KorusUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
-
P.R. HansonUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
-
D. DivineN/A, Lincoln, NE
-
S. Olafsen LackeyUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Norfolk, NE
Abstract
At the Ashland, Nebraska site, in the Platte River Valley, HEM resistivity profiles clearly identify hydrostratigraphic boundaries in Quaternary sediments and underlying bedrock to a depth of 60 meters. Six hydrostratigraphic units are recognized: loess, fine-grained alluvium, fluvial sand and gravel, undifferentiated glacial deposits, sandstone, mudrock, and limestone/shale. Digital 3-dimensional interpretations show that the alluvial aquifer is hydrologically connected to the Dakota Formation sandstone aquifer, except in an area where a discontinuous mudrock unit separates them. The high contrast in resistivity values between aquifer materials and Paleozoic limestones and shales enables major refinement of the base-of-aquifer map.
At the Firth, Nebraska site, on loess-mantled dissected till plains, we delineate hydrostratigraphic units on the basis of HEM resistivity values greater than 20 ohm/m, but the limited depth of HEM investigation restricts the characterization of deep materials to borehole data alone. We identify aquifers at three stratigraphic levels: (1) a lower aquifer, as much as 80 m thick, in sands and gravels filling a W-E trending sub-till paleovalley, and in probable outwash sands and gravels; (2) a localized middle aquifer, as much as 40 m thick, within glacial deposits; and (3) an upper aquifer, as much as 67 m thick, consisting of a broad, W-E-trending, lenticular sand body connected with multiple, smaller “ribbon-like” sand bodies (potential glacial tunnel channels), which are interpreted almost exclusively from HEM data. These putative sand bodies are 60-1500 m in width and15-30 m in thickness. HEM models further lead us to interpret subsurface loess-till contacts, buried fine-grained channel fills, and modern valley constrictions related to the geometry of a till sheet.
At both sites, 3-dimensional renderings of aquifer units reveal complex geometries and relationships undeterminable from borehole data alone. Furthermore, HEM identifies buried high-resistivity units—potential aquifers—that were previously unknown.