T165 Using Buried Soils to Reconstruct Past Climates: Opportunities and Considerations (Posters)
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
9:00 AM - 6:00 PM
Hall B
IDENTIFYING AND QUANTIFYING GOETHITE AND HEMATITE IN ATMOSPHERIC DUST AND SOURCE SEDIMENTS BY MAGNETIC METHODS
Paper number: T165-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM
Authors
-
Kimberly E. YaukUniversity of Minnesota Morris, Morris, MN
-
Harland L. GoldsteinU.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
-
Richard L. ReynoldsUnited States Geological Survey, Denver, CO
-
Bruce MoskowitzUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated several different magnetic methods, all involving variable temperatures (20 -400 K) and high magnetic fields (0-5 T), to identify the relative contributions of goethite and hematite in dust and dust sources from various locations in the US, Australia, and Africa. Our study include samples of dust-on-snow from the San Juan and Wasatch Mountains , dust from eastern Australia (Lake Cowal, Orange, Hornsby, Sydney), dust sources from southwest USA (Nellis, NV; Chinle Valley, AZ; Little Colorado River Dust Corridor, AZ; and Milford Flats, UT), and the Kalahari Desert (southern Africa).
Our preliminary findings indicate that all analyzed samples contain goethite and hematite in various proportions and most contain magnetite in trace amounts (<0.5 wt%). At 300 K, the ratio of goethite to hematite magnetizations (G/H) is highest in the Australian (>0.5) and Nellis samples (~0.3) and low in the Kalahari (<0.17), Milford Flats ( ~0.1) and some Chinle Valley (~0.07) samples. The partition between hematite and goethite is important to know to improve models for the radiative impact of ferric oxide minerals in mineral dust aerosols.