T128 The Relationship between Silicic Plutons and Ignimbrites: Exploring the Contradictions
Monday, 5 November 2012
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
208B
PEACH SPRING TUFF, AZ-CA-NV: SUPERERUPTION OF A STRATIFIED, MUSH-BASED MAGMA CHAMBER
Paper number: T128-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:00 PM – 2:20 PM
Authors
-
Jeffrey VervoortWashington State University, Pullman, WA
-
William O. FrazierVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
-
Susanne M. McDowellVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
-
Ayla S. PamukcuVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
-
Tamara L. CarleyVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
-
Guilherme A.R. GualdaVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
-
Jonathan MillerSan Jose State University, San Jose, CA
-
Charles A. FergusonArizona Geological Survey, Tucson, AZ
-
Christopher M. FisherWashington State University, Pullman, WA
Abstract
Isotope data for all pumice reveal distinctive and uniform Sr, Nd, Hf, and Pb compositions, unusual for regional volcanic sequences and plutonic complexes of comparable scale, which suggests that RP & TP are comagmatic (Frazier et al this meeting). This supports a relatively simple view of the pre-eruption magma chamber consistent with textures, mineral zoning, pumice glass and whole-pumice chemistry, and Rhyolite-MELTS modelling: TP represents a lower cumulate zone that reached a high crystal fraction (‘rigid sponge’) before experiencing intense reheating (yielding ‘remobilized mush’). RP was melt-rich magma derived from the same parent as TP cumulate, present in a cooler upper zone that experienced little reheating; it may have felt the dynamic impact of the mobilization of the chamber base in the lead-up to eruption. The high-Si rhyolite glass reflects crystal-melt equilibria within the relatively shallow chamber (~10 km; cf Gualda & Ghiorso JGeol in rev).