11 Paleolimnological Reconstructions: New Insights from the Tried and True to the Unique and New (Posters)
Thursday, 31 March 2016
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Exhibit Hall
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF AUTHIGENIC CLAYS AND BULK GEOCHEMISTRY: OLDUVAI GORGE, TANZANIA
Paper number: 11-7
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Daniel M. DeocampoGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA
-
Nathan M. RabideauxGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA
-
Javier CuadrosNatural History Museum, London
-
Jeremy S. DelaneyRutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
-
Gail M. AshleyRutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Abstract
Submicron clay fraction XRD patterns were collected by progressive centrifugation. In addition to oriented (air-dried and glycolated) clay slides, randomly oriented clay fractions were used to investigate their octahedral composition based on the position of the 060 peaks. Such peaks indicate a predominant trioctahedral composition of the clay (i.e. Mg-rich clay).
These samples were pressed into KBr pellets and FTIR analyses were conducted. Observations suggest that the IR patterns (e.g. peaks at wavenumbers 816 and 654 cm-1) are strongly related to the amounts of dioctahedral and trioctahedral smectite. Electron microprobe data were collected for further geochemical characterization.
Bulk geochemistry (e.g. MgO/(Al2O3+Fe2O3)) correlates well with the position of the 060 XRD peaks, suggesting that the bulk composition is controlled by authigenic material. Variations in both XRD and FTIR also show fluctuating Mg- and Al- enrichment within the authigenic clays, suggesting the geochemical facies of the clays may reflect changes in the paleoenvironment. When plotted on a time-series chart for the locality, electron microprobe analyses of the authigenic clays correspond very well to the variations in previously collected bulk XRF geochemistry. Therefore, authigenic clays have the potential to be used as proxies for paleoenvironmental identification.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 3
doi: 10.1130/abs/2016SE-273661
© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.