25 Paleontology, Paleoecology, and Taphonomy (Posters)
Friday, 1 April 2016
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Exhibit Hall
PREDATION REPAIR FREQUENCY IN BRACHIOPODS OF THE ORDOVICIAN KOPE FORMATION IN KENTUCKY
Paper number: 25-10
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Frank ForcinoWestern Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC
-
Emily S. StaffordWestern Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC
Abstract
Samples were collected from the Kope Formation in Flemingsburg, KY. The stratigraphic trend among the samples is coarsening upward, indicating an increase in energy through time. Generic richness, evenness, and the Shannon-Wiener Diversity were calculated for each sample. The samples were ordinated using NMDS. In addition, we examined the orthide brachiopod Austinella for repair scars and calculated repair frequency.
The results show that richness (ranging from 8 to 11), evenness (ranging from 0.7 to 0.85), and Shannon’s H (ranging from 1.5 to 2.0) were fairly consistent among the samples. In the NMDS ordination, samples 2-4, which were stratigraphically adjacent and were collected in close proximity to one another, plotted together, while samples 1 and 6 were both isolated. In the examination of repair frequency, sample 1, (the oldest sample) contained no Austinella. Sample 2 contained 41 Austinella and had a repair frequency of 2.4%. Sample 3 contained 34 Austinella with no repair scars. Sample 4 contained 13 Austinella, with a repair frequency of 15.4%. Sample 5 contained 39 Austinella, with a repair frequency of 2.6%. Sample 6 contained 21 Austinella, with a repair frequency of 9.5%. There was no statistically significant correlation between repair frequency and the paleocommunity metrics, however they did exhibit similar increases and decreases stratigraphically. In the NMDS ordination, it was noted that the sample with the highest repair frequency, Sample 4, was the most distant of the 2-5 cluster, possibly indicating that ecological differences are related to the higher repair rate. Future research will include a more in-depth analysis of the community, looking at repair scars on all brachiopod taxa for each sample, and analyzing additional samples to obtain a more representative and statistically robust result.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 3
doi: 10.1130/abs/2016SE-273811
© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.