17 Undergraduate Research Posters (Posters)
Tuesday, 5 April 2016
8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
Ballroom C
SEARCH FOR THE SOURCE OF COGSTONES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Paper number: 17-32
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 8:30 AM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Sierra F. PattersonCalifornia State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA
-
Valbone MemetiCalifornia State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA
-
Crystal CortezCalifornia State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA
Abstract
We use petrography and geochemical analysis on four cog stone fragments collected at different sites in Orange County. We are comparing these to scoria basalt collected on the SE side of Catalina Island near Two Harbors (CL1B), a site known to have been inhabited by Native Americans, the Santa Monica Mountains near La Vina Gomez de Malibu along Mulholland Highway (SAM), at Van Winkle Mountains (SW Mojave National Preserve; VW1) and at Fossil Falls along Hwy 395 (FF1). Three of the four cog stones are vesicular basaltic scoria and one is volcaniclastic tuff. Petrographic analysis revealed the cog stones are plagioclase rich with various amounts of olivine, pyroxene, oxides and iddingsite and varying grain size. Samples SAM and VW1 were eliminated as source rocks for these particular stones based on differences in petrography. The texture, grain size and mineralogy of samples CL1B and FF1, however, could be both possible matches for cog stone CS3. XRF major oxide and trace element analysis shows similarities in chemistry between FF1 and CS3 with only minor differences in SiO2, CaO, Ba, Ni, Cu and Nb content. Samples CL1B and CS3 yield some overlap in major oxide and trace element concentrations, but enough variance to indicate a match is probably less likely. However, more geochemical analyses are underway to further test our working hypotheses. If the analyses yield positive match results with Fossil Falls (FF1) and Catalina Island (CL1B), then there is a possibility that Native Americans had a reason to travel far to collect cog stone source rocks, however, other potential source rock comparisons have indicated possible nearby locations as well.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 4
doi: 10.1130/abs/2016CD-274302
© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.