T309 In-Situ Technologies for Energy Resource Extraction: The Role of Water

Wednesday, 28 September 2016
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 501

WATER-QUALITY ISSUES RELATED TO URANIUM IN SITU RECOVERY SITES

Paper number: T309-11
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:00 PM – 4:20 PM

Authors

Abstract

In the United States, uranium extraction by in situ recovery (ISR) techniques can be done in productive aquifers with surrounding groundwater that could have other uses, such as agriculture irrigation, livestock watering, or drinking water. For uranium ISR to proceed, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must approve an aquifer exemption request, which allows for injection of the in situ recovery fluids. This exemption recognizes that the presence of uranium ore makes the groundwater unfit as drinking water and possibly for other uses. Current EPA regulations indicate that no impact on groundwater quality can occur beyond the aquifer exemption boundary.

After uranium ISR is completed, restoration requirements usually specify that the water quality in the ore-bearing aquifer must be restored to pre-ISR conditions. In Texas and Wyoming, some past closures of uranium ISR sites have only required limited stability monitoring. In addition, sites were often closed based on a ‘‘class of use’’ for groundwater, which meant that the groundwater within the restored zone was not always restored to pre-ISR conditions for all constituents. For many of these sites, long-term impacts on downgradient groundwater quality were not thoroughly evaluated, and long-term monitoring was not always required.

Uranium ISR results in significant geochemical changes in the solid and water phases. The long-term impacts of these changes are not easy to determine or predict; however, nearby stakeholders (including the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management) are interested in strong evidence that downgradient groundwater quality is protected. An evaluation of future groundwater quality requires an understanding of the surrounding hydrogeology, knowledge of post-ISR and post-restoration geochemistry, including both water and solids, and predictions of future rock–water interactions. These interactions can be tested using batch, column, and field-scale experiments, and they should include testing with actual restored groundwater. Reactive transport modeling using data from these experiments is likely the best approach to demonstrate future downgradient groundwater quality, albeit having a relatively large range of uncertainty. Current research on these various techniques will be summarized.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7

doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-279459

© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.