Although it has been common practice for ca. 200 years, constant bed thickness extrapolation in cross-section construction leads to three major pitfalls in the interpretation of kilometric-scale folds: 1. Seemingly applicable kinematic models may fail to correctly predict the structure. 2. Predicted upper detachments may not exist or may have smaller than expected displacement. 3. Bed-length imbalance problems are not necessarily the result of area loss. Pitfalls 1 & 2 are illustrated using simulated outcrop traverses across two seismically well-imaged, area-balanced detachment folds from the deep-water Niger Delta fold belt. One anticline has the limb-dip relationships of a fault-bend fold and the other of a fault-propagation fold. For the fault-bend example, the model provides a reasonable prediction of the lower detachment location but requires significant displacement on a non-existent upper detachment. The deeper predicted upper detachment implies a total displacement that is too large by half whereas the shallower predicted upper detachment gives a displacement that is too small by half. For the fault-propagation-fold style anticline, the model resembles the fold style but provides a poor prediction of the location of lower detachment, the position of the ramp, the location of the ramp tip, and indicates a displacement that is too small by half. Orogenic shortening calculated from kinematic model-based interpretations should be considered to have an error of ± 50%. Pitfall 3 is illustrated by one of the Niger Delta seismic profiles and by an analog model. Line-length restoration of the seismic profile shows significant length discrepancies which might be interpreted to be the result of tectonic compaction of the shorter beds, whereas the area-depth relationship shows the section to be area balanced. The sandbox model is an imbricate stack of thrust-ramp anticlines for which the total restored line lengths are far short of their original lengths, a difference previously inferred to result from tectonic compaction. The calculated horizontal compaction exceeds that possible from grain rearrangement and would require cataclasis. The area-depth relationship shows the section to be balanced with a small dilation. In both examples the apparent excess shortening results from unrecognized bed thickening.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7
© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.