T263 Dynamics of Continental Margin Sedimentation (Posters)

Tuesday, 27 September 2016
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Exhibit Hall E/F

REGIONAL AND LOCAL SOURCES OF RELATIVE SEA-LEVEL CHANGE AT SANDY HOOK, NJ

Paper number: T263-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

Geologic studies of Sandy Hook, NJ provide an opportunity to evaluate regional and local controls on relative sea level (RSL) change. 20th century tide gauge records from Sandy Hook indicate 4.0±0.5 mm/yr of RSL rise, whereas records from The Battery, NY, 26 km NW, indicate a rise of 3.0±0.3 mm/yr. Subsidence due to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) is 1.3±0.4 mm/yr for the 20th century at both locations. Sandy Hook rests atop compressible coastal plain sediments, whereas The Battery overlies incompressible bedrock. We seek to explain the different subsidence histories by evaluating contributions from compaction of peats, compaction of siliciclastic muds, and anthropogenic groundwater withdrawal.

Three cores were drilled on Sandy Hook to investigate the localized sea level signal; recovering unusually thick (85+ m) sections of deglacial to Holocene (0-13,350 cal yrs) sediments. ~25 m of the section was deposited rapidly in ≤200 yrs and may be infill after a jökulhlaup (~13,350 cal yrs) that unconformably overlies Cretaceous strata. Sedimentological studies yielded high-resolution grain size, total organic carbon (TOC), and porosity data from each core. Relatively low TOC values (~4% in mud; ~1% in sand) indicate that compaction of organic material is unlikely to contribute to the local rate of subsidence. Numerical models quantify that natural compaction of deglacial muds likely reduced the column thickness by 10-20% over the past 13,350 cal yrs. Past compaction rates were tens of millimeters per year, but the 20-21st century rate is quantified as ~0.1-0.2 mm/yr. The remaining 0.8-0.9 mm/yr difference in subsidence between Sandy Hook and The Battery is likely due to anthropogenic groundwater withdrawal. Quantifying groundwater’s contribution is complicated by poor documentation of past withdrawal rates and overlapping of local (Fort Hancock) and regional (Monmouth County) groundwater withdrawals. Initial cone of depression estimates suggest Fort Hancock’s pumping station influenced the tide gauge (~2 km NE), with additional influence from Monmouth County wells. Future groundwater modeling will attempt to quantify the contribution of groundwater withdrawal to local subsidence, though the order of contribution appears to be GIA, local/regional groundwater, and compaction of thick Quaternary muds.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7

doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-281868

© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.