T247 Supporting Geoscience Student Transfer Between Institutions and Transitions into the Workforce: Pathways for Success (Posters)
Tuesday, 27 September 2016
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Exhibit Hall E/F
USING CAREER EXPERIENCES TO STRENGTHEN PATHWAYS INTO THE GEOSCIENCE WORKFORCE
Paper number: T247-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM
Authors
-
Stuart BirnbaumUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
-
Walt GrayUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
-
Alexis GodetUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
-
J.K. HaschenburgerUniv of Texas at San AntonioGeological Sciences, San Antonio, TX
-
Anne-Marie NunezThe University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
-
David J. YoungThe University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
Abstract
The program utilizes a “medical school rotational” model in which two cohorts of junior level students will cycle through semester-long internship experiences in three of four career pathways: academia, energy resources, geo-environmental assessment, and water resources. These geoscience careers are featured prominently in South Texas, and are key sectors nationally.
To promote success in the degree and beyond, the three-year program uses a tiered set of criteria to identify 18 undergraduate participants. Instead of focusing on high-performing students, our program aims to augment the talent pool by targeting those who might be underperforming in their GPAs, but show potential to improve. From this group, a diverse set of participants will be invited to join the program. An additional 18 students will participate in the academic internship experience only. Our intent is to develop capacity for analyzing comparison groups: (1) participants in both academic and applied internships; (2) participants in the academic internship only; and (3) non-participants. Research has shown that a research experience can improve student outcomes, and our evaluation of both the single academic internship and multiple applied internships proffers a unique opportunity to determine what experiences improve student performance and job success. The program evaluation will address affective outcomes (e.g., self-confidence, motivation and familiarity with geoscience careers) and cognitive outcomes (e.g., academic performance and timely graduation). Multiple data collection efforts will build a holistic picture of challenges and best practices affecting student success.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7
doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-282277
© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.