T48 Friends of Hoth: Satellites of the Outer Solar System
Sunday, 25 September 2016
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 201
PLUTO SYSTEM CRATERING HISTORY AND SURFACE AGES
Paper number: T48-6
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:45 PM – 3:00 PM
Authors
-
Veronica J. BrayUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
-
Harold A. WeaverJohns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD
-
Alan D. HowardUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
-
Leslie A. YoungSouthwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO
-
Cathy OlkinSouthwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO
-
Kimberly EnnicoSpace Science Division, Moffett Field, CA
-
Jeffrey MooreMoffett Field, CA
-
Richard BinzelMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
-
New Horizons Science TeamSouthwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO
-
William B. McKinnonDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Saint Louis, MO
-
Sarah GreenstreetLas Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network, Goleta, CA
-
Brett GladmanUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
-
Alex ParkerSouthwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO
-
Stuart J. RobbinsSouthwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO
-
Paul M. SchenkUniversities Space Research Association, Houston, TX
-
John R. SpencerSouthwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO
-
S. Alan SternSouthwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO
Abstract
Pluto’s terrains display a diversity of crater retention ages and terrain types, indicating ongoing geologic activity and a variety of resurfacing styles including both exogenic and endogenic processes (Moore et al., 2016, Science, 351, 1284-1293). Charon’s informally named Vulcan Planum did experience early resurfacing, but crater densities suggest this is a relatively ancient surface, as are the northern terrains on Charon. The crater densities on Nix and Hydra indicate an old age similar to Charon’s (Weaver et al., 2016, Science, 351).
The crater size-frequency distributions for both Pluto and Charon break to shallower slope for craters smaller than 10 km in diameter. We observe this paucity of small craters (relative to a constant slope extrapolated from larger craters) on all terrains, despite adequate resolution to observe them. This lack of small craters cannot be explained by geological resurfacing alone. The lack of small craters on Pluto and Charon is more consistent with solar system formation models that result in fewer small impactors (e.g., Chiang and Youdin, 2010, AREPS, 38, 493-522; Nesvorny et al., 2010, AJ, 140, 785-793).
This work was supported by NASA’s New Horizons project.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7
doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-284445
© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.