T128 pXRF in the Geosciences: Applications to Environmental, Regional, and Exploration Geology

Monday, 26 September 2016
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 404

APPLICATION OF PXRF TO REGIONAL SURFICIAL TILL GEOCHEMISTRY STUDIES IN NORTHERN CANADA

Paper number: T128-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:50 PM – 2:05 PM

Authors

Abstract

The geochemistry of glacial till (diamicton) samples from two regional surficial studies in the area to the east of Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada was determined by pXRF and by ‘traditional’ laboratory analyses. Sample preparation for the 1st study (n = 241) consisted of drying at 60 °C, and then shaking the sample in a 15 ml container to induce granular convection, which brings the pebbles and coarse sand to the surface. This coarser material was removed, leaving a clay + silt + fine-medium sand fraction for subsequent pXRF analysis. pXRF analysis was also completed on the <0.063 mm fraction. Sample preparation for the 2nd study (n = 106) consisted of drying at 60 °C, then sieving to <2 mm followed by pXRF analysis, and also pXRF analysis on the original non-dried sample. For both sample sets, aqua regia, 4 acid, and fusion digestions followed by ICP-ES/MS analysis was determined on the <0.063 mm (clay+silt) and the <2 mm fractions. Comparison of the ‘shaken’ or sieved pXRF data with <0.063 mm laboratory data (fusion or 4-acid methods) from both studies demonstrates that pXRF analyses can provide highly valuable and cost effective information. While the pXRF data does not exactly replicate the laboratory data (in terms of precision and accuracy), the relationship between pXRF data and fusion or 4-acid data is highly systematic, and typically linear with high r2 values. Coincident geochemical anomalies are observed on interpolated single element maps generated from the lab data and the pXRF data. Comparisons of aqua regia (partial digestion) and pXRF (a total analysis) data sets are poor and not systematic, as would be expected. pXRF data for the <0.063 mm size fraction, and the ‘shaken’ samples are an excellent proxy for the <0.063 mm laboratory data; the pXRF < 2 mm sieved data is also comparable to the laboratory data. pXRF data from till samples that have not been dried and sieved or shaken to remove pebbles and coarser material typically exhibit much greater scatter (lower r2 values), and also lower concentration levels for a number of elements, and this practice is in general not recommended.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7

doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-284954

© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.