T139 Fifty Years of Innovation in Petrology and Orogenic Systems II: A Tribute to Lincoln Hollister

Monday, 26 September 2016
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 205


WATER CONTENT OF BIOTITE AS MONITOR OF CHANGE IN WATER ACTIVITY

Paper number: T139-16
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 5:15 PM – 5:30 PM


Authors


Abstract

Water activity is an important quantity during metamorphic processes. It can vary due to the absence or presence of a fluid phase, or the composition of the fluid phase though (e.g., additional CO2, NaCl, etc.). Water activity variations have been invoked to explain many processes such as melting in the crust, granulite formation, equilibrium domains and the kinetics of mineral reactions. It is inferred from low-variant mineral assemblages. Hydrous minerals can, in principle, monitor aH2O through the exchange reaction 2 OH-bt -> O2-bt + H2Ofluid. Here we report SIMS analyses of water content in biotites from two different contact aureoles to test the feasibility of this hypothesis.

In the mid-crustal contact aureole of the western Adamello1, the OH- content of biotites in pelitic schists decreases with increasing temperature. Ti content increases, while no correlation with Cl or F was observed. Ti-content varies within individual samples, but no correlation with OH- was observed. Hence the Ti-oxygen substitution2 is not solely responsible for water decrease in biotites. We rather interpret the decrease of OH- content from 3.41 ± 0.09 p.f.u. for sub-solidus samples to 3.27 ±0.08 p.f.u. for partially molten rocks as an indication of a decrease in water activity due to fluid absent partial melting.

In the Ubehebe Peak contact aureole, OH- content of phlogopites were measured in two different metacarbonate samples with different fluid composition3, as determined by phase petrology. Water content decreases in biotite with increasing CO2 in the fluid phase from 2.8-3.8 p.f.u. to 1.5-2.2 p.f.u. Since there is virtually no Fe or Ti in these phlogopites we interpret this clear trend of OH- content in biotite to monitor water activity during crystallisation.

In conclusion, water content in biotite is a powerful tool to constrain the relative evolution of water activity of a system, but it still need a good experimental calibration of the relation between these two variables to have an absolute value.

1Floess and Baumgartner (2012) Terra Nova 25, 144-150.

2Cesare et al. (2008) American Mineralogist, 93, 327–338.

3Roselle et al. (1999) American Journal of Science, 299, 93–138.


Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7

doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-285414

© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.