147 Recent Advances in Archaeological Geology (Posters)
Monday, 26 September 2016
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Exhibit Hall E/F
GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND SOURCING OF LITHIC ARTIFACTS FROM THE MAKUYUNI BEDS LOCALITY 4, TANZANIA
Paper number: 147-22
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM
Authors
-
Karl R. WirthMacalester College, Saint Paul, MN
-
Pastory Magayane BushoziUniversity of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam
Abstract
The MK4 lithic artifacts excavated in this study were closely associated with remains of Bovidae, Equidae, and Elephantidae and are composed of both volcanic rock (20 tools, 45 cores, and 45 debitage flakes) and quartzite (72 tools, 59 cores, and 1004 debitage flakes). The 27 volcanic artifacts analyzed in this study are subdivided into three distinct groups (A, B, C) based on the abundance and type of phenocrysts (pyroxene, olivine, plagioclase, respectively). Samples of local bedrock exhibit petrographic features that map onto the same three textural groups represented by the artifacts. Major element compositions classify the Group B artifacts as basalt, whereas Group A and C artifacts have compositions ranging from basaltic trachyandesite to mugearite. All of the artifacts have similar trace element patterns, with more incompatible trace elements (e.g., Ce, La, Nb, Th, Ba) exhibiting progressively greater enrichment typical of lavas in rift settings. The patterns of Group B artifacts are similar to those in A and C, but with distinctly lower normalized concentrations. Samples of local bedrock have trace element patterns that are similar to the artifacts in the equivalent textural groups.
The textures and compositions of the Makuyuni tools are all represented by samples from local bedrock exposures. Furthermore, the compositions of the Makuyuni tools are sufficiently distinct from analyzed samples from other regional volcanic centers (e.g., Ngorongoro, Oldeani, or Natron), suggesting that the entire Makuyuni tool assemblage was derived solely from local (<6 km) exposures. These findings are in stark contrast with the more distal provenances (>300 km) inferred from lithic tools used by later hominins (Middle Stone Age; 200,000-130,000 BP) in the same region and support models of a progression in raw material acquisition and manufacture, from local to more distant sources over time.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7
doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-287055
© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.