72 Biogeochemistry & Geobiology of Anoxic/Euxinic Systems (Posters)

Tuesday, 21 March 2017
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Urban, 17th Floor

A NOVEL METHOD TO REDUCE AND QUANTIFY ELEMENTAL SULFUR

Paper number: 72-4
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 1:30 PM – 5:30 PM

Authors

  • Martin Kurek Presenting Author
    Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
  • Gregory Druschel
    Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
  • William Gilhooly
    Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN

Abstract

The concentration of elemental sulfur in modern and ancient geologic systems can reveal the biogeochemical conditions at the time of deposition. Such measurements can be made from extracting the sulfur from sediment or water samples and quantifying the sulfur at each depth as sulfide. Elemental sulfur concentations can themselves be analyzed using HPLC and other complex methodologies; however, the preparation and analysis times can be long and these instruments often require regular maintenance. Current reduction methods involve the use of costly and specialized glassware in addition to toxins such as chromium chloride or cyanide to reduce the sulfur to sulfide for concentration measurements as well as d34S isotopic analysis. Our new reduction method uses dithiothreitol (DTT) as a less toxic reducing agent to obtain both elemental sulfur concentrations and isotopic signatures. The sample is dissolved in a liquid medium and upon reaction with DTT, the elemental sulfur is volatalized as sulfide and collected in a basic trap using an inexpensive gas extraction apparatus. Our method development shows that the evolved sulfide concentrations can easily be measured using a field absorbance spectrometer or voltammetry techniques. Using the field spectrometer, sulfide quantification has a wide range from 5 µM to 100 µM, with sulfide detection by the instrument even lower at 1 µM. We scaled the method to 10 ml gas-tight reaction vessels that fit a 36-position block heater, and thus many samples can be extracted simultaneously. The procedure is quantitative at >95% recovery, and highly specific to elemental sulfur. Multiple extractions demonstrate that the method does not extract pyrite (FeS2), acid-volatile sulfides (FeS), or sulfate. We demonstrate the utility of our new extraction procedure on environmental samples with elemental sulfur concentration profiles of modern lacustrine surface sediments collected from a lake in Minnesota.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 2

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017NE-290961

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.