45 Paleomagnetism, Rock Magnetism, and Archaeomagnetism I

Thursday, 25 May 2017
8:30 AM - 11:50 AM
Room 318B


THE PSEUDO-THELLIER PALEOINTENSITY METHOD: NEW CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATES

Paper number: 45-7
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 10:25 AM – 10:45 AM


Authors


Abstract

Non-heating paleointensity methods are a vital tool to explore field strength variations recorded by thermally sensitive materials of both terrestrial and extraterrestrial origin. One such method is the calibrated pseudo-Thellier method in which a specimen’s NRM is AF demagnetized and replaced with a laboratory induced ARM (as an analog of a TRM). Using a set of 56 volcanic specimens given laboratory TRMs in fields of 10–130 μT, we refine the calibration of the pseudo-Thellier method and better define the uncertainty associated with its paleointensity estimates. Our new calibration, obtained from 32 selected specimens, resolves the issue of non-zero intercept, which is theoretically predicted, but not satisfied by any previous calibration. The range of individual specimen calibration factors, however, is large, but consistent with the variability expected for SD magnetite.

We explore a number of rock magnetic parameters to try and identify selection thresholds for reducing the calibration scatter, but fail to find a suitable choice. We infer that our careful paleointensity selection process may be largely screening out any strong rock magnetic dependence.

As a consequence of the variability in the calibration factor, the uncertainty associated with pseudo-Thellier results is much larger than previously indicated. The scatter of the calibration is ~25% of the mean value, which implies that, when combined with the scatter of results typically obtained from a single site, the uncertainty of averaged pseudo-Thellier results will always be >25%. As such, pseudo-Thellier results should be complementary to, and cross-validated with results from other methods. Nevertheless, the pseudo-Thellier method remains a valuable tool for obtaining paleointensity estimates from thermally sensitive geological, archeological, and extraterrestrial materials and with careful data selection and analysis can yield results that are accurate to within a factor of 4 or better.


Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 4

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017CD-292463

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.