23 Advances in Geothermal Resource Investigation I
Wednesday, 24 May 2017
8:30 AM - 11:50 AM
Room 318A
TWO SIMPLE METHODS IN GEO-RECONNAISSANCE: THE VOTER-VETO-CONFIDENCE METHOD AND THE BACK-PROPAGATION OF ADVECTED GEOCHEMICAL SIGNALS
Paper number: 23-5
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 9:35 AM – 9:55 AM
Authors
-
Garrett ItoSOEST, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI
-
Nicole LautzeUniversity of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI
-
Donald ThomasCenter for the Study of Active Volcanoes, Hilo, HI
-
Nicholas H. HinzUniversity of Nevada, Reno, NV
-
Robert WhittierUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI
Abstract
The voter-veto-confidence method is a way to combine different types of spatial data to estimate a spatially varying presence-absence probability (or probability function if there are multiple possibilities) based on a combination of expert elicitation and statistics. It also estimates our spatially-varying confidence in that probability estimate. Absent any training data, some degree of expert elicitation is always needed, but the degree is reduced as the volume of data increases. Types of expert information include weighting, thresholding, and censoring. Extracting such information from experts is a field in itself, as even experts are more accurate when thinking in terms of natural frequencies rather than probabilities.
Imagine a well with a solute or contaminant anomaly—in what upstream area did it originate? If computation time were not a constraint we would simulate sources on a grid of possible locations and run the forward model for each possible location (and reasonable flow field) to get a numerical Green’s function. Unfortunately such a computation is seldom feasible in reconnaissance. Instead we use Claerbout’s principle: the transpose of a linear operator is a low-resolution, un-scaled approximation to the inverse of that operator. Using a reasonable flow field, we generate approximate stream and time functions then use those to propagate a homogeneous-flow Green’s function backward up the inhomogeneous flow field. It’s crude, but very fast, and appears to depend only weakly on the coordinate origin used to generate the approximate stream and time functions.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 4
doi: 10.1130/abs/2017CD-293007
© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.