91 D11. Paleontology, Paleoecology/Taphonomy

Monday, 23 October 2017
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 606

COMPARING COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND DYNAMICS BETWEEN IN-PLACE AND SURFACE-COLLECTED SAMPLES

Paper number: 91-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:30 AM – 9:45 AM

Authors

Abstract

There are two methods of collecting fossil communities: surface collection of individual fossils and in-place, bulk collection of sediment or rock. The use of in-place samples tends to be more intensive, but is believed to better represent the fossil community. We compared paleocommunity results of surface-collected to in-place, bulk fossil samples.

We collected 14 4-L in-place samples and 7 surface samples from three outcrops of the Pennsylvanian Finis Shale in Jacksboro, Texas. At the East Spillway locality, samples were divided into three 1 m stratigraphic portions. At the two others, in-place and surface samples were lumped. Two to three people collected each surface sample to reduce bias.

We conducted analyses using abundance counts of brachiopods and mollusks and presence/absence (P/A) of all taxa. In both datasets, the surface samples have a significantly greater richness (22 to 43 genera) than the in-place samples (12 to 21) (p < 0.001). Surface samples are also significantly more even (p = 0.002) (surface mean 0.75; in-place 0.56).

Using NMDS ordination, there is strong separation between surface and in-place samples for both abundance and P/A data; permanova shows a significant difference (p = 0.002 abundance; p < 0.001 P/A). For the Spillway East locality, the differences between in-place and surface samples decrease up section. Evenness increases up section for the in-place samples (0.33, 0.50, 0.67) but decreases up section for the surface samples (0.83, 0.78, 0.55). Decreasing relative abundance of the brachiopod Crurithyris drives the in-place evenness.

Potential explanations for these differences include: 1) Preservation: large or fragile specimens may be damaged in disaggregation of bulk samples, but survive natural weathering. 2) Volume: surface specimens weathered from a greater volume of original rock, so more taxa may be present. 3) Collector bias: human collectors may pick up larger, better preserved, or rare specimens. Efforts to avoid bias toward abundant taxa could inflate evenness. 4) Down-slope weathering: at the East Spillway locality, true diversity patterns may have been “smeared” by fossils from higher beds.

In-place samples likely better represent the once-living community. When surface collecting is preferred, it may be wise to collect an in-place sample to assess biases.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-296123

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.