32 D3. The Geochemistry, Biogeochemistry, and Ecology of Cave and Karst Settings
Sunday, 22 October 2017
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 612
COSMOGENIC 10BE AND 26AL STUDIES OF THE RISING STAR SITE, CRADLE OF HUMANKIND, SOUTH AFRICA: MYSTERY OF THE TRUE DENUDATION RATES
Paper number: 32-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:35 PM – 1:50 PM
Authors
-
J.D. KramersUniversity of Johannesburg, Johannesburg
-
D. ScherlerGFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Potsdam
-
D. ScherlerFreie University of Berlin, Berlin
-
H. WittmannGFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Potsdam
-
P.H.G.M. DirksJames Cook University, Townsville
-
P.H.G.M. DirksUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
-
S.R. WinkleriThemba LABS, Johannesburg
Abstract
Soil samples yield the highest [10Be] followed by clast samples, with bedrock chert samples yielding the lowest (Table 1). The average apparent erosion rates for the soil and clast samples are similar within 1σ: 3.58 ± 1.91 m/Ma and 4.29 ± 0.69 m/Ma, respectively. The average apparent erosion rate for the bedrock chert is up to three times faster than for soils and clasts (11.28 ± 1.09 m/Ma). All soil samples have 26Al/10Be ratios significantly lower than the 6.75 surface steady state ratio.
Based on 10Be denudation rates previously found (3.6 m/Ma, [2]; 3.44 m/Ma, [1]), the landscape across the CoH is considered old and eroding slowly. High erosion rates similar to our results (5.13 - 15.02 m/Ma) for chert bedrock are ascribed to fast river incision or a recent partial collapse event [1,2]. In contrast, we think our high outcrop erosion rates reflect true denudation and the low apparent values from soil samples indicate long retention of quartz on surface, while dolomite is largely removed in solution. The quartz then experiences periods of burial and reworking in caves and river terraces, resulting in low 26Al/10Be ratios.
|
Table 1: Range of [10Be] and [26Al] (106 atoms/g) |
||
|
Samples |
[10Be] |
[26Al] |
|
Soils |
2.28 – 3.91 |
13.13 – 19.58 |
|
Clasts |
1.02 – 2.43 |
7.79 – 14.04 |
|
Bedrock chert |
0.457 – 0.904 |
3.79 – 6.66 |
[1] Dirks et al., 2016. J. Hum. Evol., 96, 19-34.
[2] Dirks et al., 2010. Science, 328, 205-208.
[3] Dirks and Berger, 2013. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 78, 109-131.
[4] Partridge et al., 2003. Science, 300, 607-612.
[5] Gibbon et al., 2014. Quat Geochron., 24, 10-15.
[6] Granger et al., 2015. Nature, 522, 85-88.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-297563
© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.