T16 Advancing Seismic and Sequence Stratigraphy: Insights from Testing the Fundamentals

Sunday, 22 October 2017
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 307/308

ACCOMMODATION – NOT A SIGNIFICANT CONTROL ON RIVERINE STRATIGRAPHY?

Paper number: T16-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 9:20 AM

Authors

Abstract

According to sequence stratigraphy, accommodation or base level is considered the key control on fluvial stratigraphy. Changes in accommodation are expected to occur due to subsidence or relative sea- or lake-level changes, whereas base-level control may also include creation or destruction of local depocenters.

This widely used concept contradicts the fundamental principles on riverine deposition (e.g. Lane, 1955), that state that channels aggrade when sediment supply exceeds transport capacity of the discharge regime, and degrade when water discharge transport capacity exceeds the sediment supply. This contradiction is further illustrated by modern highly aggradational river systems that form fluvial fans. Fluvial fans may be elevated 100 m above the surrounding floodplains, rather than fill local depocenters. Subsidence in such systems is significant for long-term preservation rather than for accumulation. Furthermore, a river can continue avulsions within a zone of a fluvial fan that is topographically higher than some other parts of the fan, as lateral river mobility by avulsions is controlled by channel super-elevation as a result of local depositional-erosional dynamics.

In ancient systems amalgamated sandy river systems are commonly interpreted as low-accommodation systems and floodplain-prone isolated channel systems as high-accommodation systems and linked to either tectonic controls or higher frequency relative sea-level lowstands and highstands. Channel amalgamation however is controlled by avulsion rates and channel return frequency. Avulsion rates are in turn primarily driven by local channel bed aggradation rates and thus discharge transport capacity. Well-documented ancient examples illustrate that amalgamated sand-prone channels may occur in the thickest parts of preserved fluvial stratigraphy, whereas floodplain-prone isolated channel bodies occur in the thinnest portions, contradicting the accommodation as the key control. Furthermore, amalgamated sand-prone channel systems can in places be laterally correlated into floodplain-rich isolated channels from axial to distal parts of fluvial fans.

We conclude that accommodation is not the key control on riverine stratigraphy and highlight the need to return to fundamental principles of river deposition.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-301279

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.