T25 Volcanism and Tectonism across the Solar System

Sunday, 22 October 2017
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Tahoma 1

STRESSING OUT: A LOOK AT THE STRESS REGIME OF ENCELADUS’ SOUTH POLE

Paper number: T25-14
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 11:25 AM – 11:40 AM

Authors

  • Ashley Schoenfeld Presenting Author
    University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
  • An Yin
    University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Abstract

Enceladus is a small moon of Saturn (radius ~250 km), distinguished by its uniquely active south pole. The moon’s geological activity is expressed as cyclic eruption of plumes sourced from a series of parallel ‘‘tiger-stripe” fractures (TSF) (Porco et al., 2006). The cyclic nature of the plume’s eruption has been attributed to diurnal variations of tidal stresses acting on the moon. There is, however, a mismatch in timing between Cassini’s observations of peak eruption and what is predicted by the theory of tidally modulated cracks as driven by orbital eccentricity (Nimmo et al., 2014). Previous studies introduce physical libration of the moon (Hurford et al. 2009; Nimmo et al. 2014), as well as rheological modeling (Běhounková et al. 2015), to reconcile the observed time delay. In general, these prior models assume a tectonically stress free ice shell when modeling the opening and closing of the TSF’s. The work that we present here is a first order attempt to tackle the validity of assuming a tectonically stress free ice shell when modeling the opening and closing of the TSFs. We investigate the total stress as a result of three sources: tidal stress creating an averaged bulge figure, stress induced by physical libration, and tectonic stresses. We postulate that the observed delay in eruption is a result of the relative difference in magnitude of the three stress sources. The mathematical framework we employ to calculate tidal stress and libration-induced stress follows that of Hurford et al. 2009. The derivation and determination of the tectonic stress tensor in the South Polar Terrain is our own work. We find tectonically derived stresses to be non-trivial; while these results are perhaps not surprising, the need for a more comprehensive plume eruption model, one that includes both tidal and tectonic stresses in its mathematical framework, is evident. We posit that perhaps the fundamental question of eruption timing may lie in cultivating this understanding.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-301690

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.