T241 The Geological Signature of Natural Hazard Events II
Tuesday, 24 October 2017
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Chelan 5
BEACH RIDGES, BURIED EROSIONAL SCARPS AND OVERHANGING SOILS EVIDENCE RECURRING PAST CO-SEISMIC SUBSIDENCE MIDWAY ALONG THE AREA OF THE GIANT 1960 CHILE EARTHQUAKE
Paper number: T241-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:00 PM – 2:15 PM
Authors
-
Cyntia MizobeUniversidad Católica de Valparaiso, Valparaiso 1
-
Robert L. WessonDenver, CO
-
Lisa L. ElyCentral Washington University, Ellensburg, WA
-
Ariel MuñozUniversidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Valparaíso
-
Tina DuraRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
-
Galo ValdebenitoUniversidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia
-
Daniel MelnickUniversidad Austral, Valdivia
-
Daniel MelnickValdivia
Abstract
Air photos show that the 1960 subsidence produced rapid, strong retrogradation of the plain front facing the bay. However, by 1979 the plain started to prograde into the bay, building a tight sequence of parallel ridges and a beach, although no post-1960 land-level change is evident in the area. Conversely, the flanks of the plain have eroded as the river and inlet have widened since 1960. Erosional scarps in the banks, capped by overhanging topsoil and toppled soil blocks, resulting from caving of the basal sand, concentrate heavy minerals and organic wrack marking the high-tide swash zone.
We found a series of buried scarps, overhanging soils and toppled blocks along drainage ditches and GPR profiles across the plain. The lowest blocks, below the water table, preserve horizontal, woody roots in growth position. The scarps and soils are buried by parallel-laminated sand with abundant heavy-mineral and wrack layers that grades upward into lighter sand with progressively steeper, landward-dipping laminae, which occasionally forms a capping ridge.
We interpret the scarps, soils and ridges as produced by a series of co-seismic subsidence events, and possible subsequent emergence, based on: i) the modern analog from 1960, ii) the lateral extension of the buried features along the paleocoasts, and iii) the age match with some of the events recorded at Chuyaquen. We base this match on radiocarbon dating of the roots—likely killed by subsidence that lowered them below the water table or into the intertidal zone. Currently, we are searching for additional evidence and bracketing the ages by cross-dating root rings with regional tree-ring master chronologies.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-302380
© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.