T110 Glacier-Landscape Interactions, Loess Paleoclimatology, and Interdisciplinary Quaternary Science I: In Memory of Stephen C. Porter
Monday, 23 October 2017
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Chelan 4
MISSOULA MEGAFLOODS AND PRE-WISCONSIN AGE OF MOSES AND UPPER GRAND COULEES
Paper number: T110-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:40 AM – 9:55 AM
Authors
Abstract
Giant Pangborn gravel bar 200 m above Columbia River near Wenatchee accumulated during immense late Wisconsin flood(s) down Columbia valley. Ice-rafted erratics register the upper limit of megaflood 325 m above the river. Fancher bar 45 m higher than Pangborn bar also has tall foreset beds, but its gravel is partly rotted and capped by 2 m of calcrete. And western Quincy basin holds such partly rotted basaltic gravel capped by calcrete whose foreset beds dip east into the basin. These areas show great pre-Wisconsin flood(s) down the Columbia that backflooded into Quincy basin. Similar field evidence for the late Wisconsin is lacking.
Columbia tributary Foster Creek heads at a divide saddle into Moses Coulee. When advancing Okanogan ice blocked the Columbia but not also Foster Creek, glacial Lake Columbia stood at a high 640–690 m level before upper Grand Coulee completed. Such a high level made Moses Coulee easier to invade by a large Missoula flood. This seems the scenario causing deepest Missoula flood(s) and most erosion in Moses Coulee. But once the head of Grand Coulee opened, Moses Coulee became hard to flood. During the late Wisconsin, only when Okanogan-lobe ice has blocked the Columbia but not also Foster Creek can floodwater rise deep enough to overflow into Moses Coulee—and then only in largest floods. Five such late Wisconsin Missoula floods poured down Moses Coulee. But Moses Coulee’s main excavation story lies in pre-Wisconsin glaciations—before upper Grand Coulee’s great cataract had eaten into Columbia valley.
New-generation 2-D modeling of the Scabland floods (Denlinger and others, adjacent paper) confirm such very different flooding results under differing Pleistocene ponding scenarios.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-303456
© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.