T342 Basalt Weathering on Earth and Mars

Wednesday, 25 October 2017
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Tahoma 1

FORMATION AND WEATHERING OF ACIDIC HYDROTHERMAL SULFUR-RICH DEPOSITS IN ICELAND: IMPLICATIONS FOR SULFATE FORMATION ON MARS

Paper number: T342-10
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 3:45 PM – 4:00 PM

Authors

Abstract

The sulfate (SO4) enrichment on the Martian surface has been linked to hydrothermal and sulfuric acid weathering processes in some locations. In terrestrial settings, reduced sulfur (S) minerals (e.g., elemental S, sulfides) are usually dominant in acidic hot spring sediments, yet SO4 is the main S-species remotely detected in proposed hydrothermal locations on Mars (e.g. Gusev Crater). Therefore, this study characterizes S-rich minerals in Icelandic hot springs and mud pots to test the validity of hydrothermal SO4 on Mars. Iceland is a useful geochemical analog because of high H2S emissions and active basaltic volcanism with acidic hydrothermal features and sulfuric acid weathering of basaltic bedrock. In Aug 2016, sediment samples were collected from Icelandic hot springs and mud pots to evaluate the contents and oxidation states of the main S-bearing minerals. The sulfur sequential extraction method was used to determine the quantities and types of S-rich minerals. Results indicate that the most dominate S minerals are elemental S (<0.50 to 7.75 wt % S) and chromium-reducible sulfides (<0.90 to 5.45 wt % S) compared to lower concentrations of acid-soluble sulfates (<0.05 to 1.45 wt % S) and acid-volatile sulfides (<0.05 wt % S). There was no clear relationship between the contents of various S minerals and temperature, pH, or redox. However, the highest wt % S (>5-8) was associated with low pH (<4) waters and a temperature range of ~40 to 70°C. This supports the notion that low pH leads to formation and elevated contents of various S minerals in hydrothermal springs. The observed variability in the contents and types of S minerals may be due to localized and fluctuating H2S gas emission. Similar to Iceland, we expect that elemental S and sulfide minerals would form concomitant with SO4 on Mars. The lack of detection of reduced S minerals indicates either i) hydrothermal processes were not responsible for SO4 enrichment on Mars, ii) subsequent oxidative weathering has oxidized reduced S, and/or iii) elemental S and sulfide minerals are abundant yet undetected with current instrumentation. While spectroscopic detection of elemental S and sulfide is difficult, our results show that an increased effort of detecting these minerals is crucial to better constrain the origin of SO4 on Mars.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-303555

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.