T203 Building an Inclusive Geoscience Community Today for Tomorrow I
Tuesday, 24 October 2017
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 2A
INVESTIGATING MODELS OF TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED GROUP WORK ON AN INCLUSIVE INTERNATIONAL FIELD TRIP
Paper number: T203-13
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 11:00 AM – 11:15 AM
Authors
-
Helen CromptonOld Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
-
Anita M. MarshallUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, FL
-
Steven WhitmeyerJames Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
-
Chris AtchisonUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
-
Eric PyleJames Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
-
Ivan CarabajalUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
-
Jennifer PiatekConnecticut
-
Susan ErikssonDavis, CA
Abstract
During a 10 day field trip, 11 students, 5 faculty lecturers, and 2 graduate student teaching assistants, visited a series of geology field sites in the west of Ireland; observed and supported by an evaluator and 2 technology-enhanced learning researchers. An iPad, which included a set of geology and note-taking apps, was provided to each student. Evaluated through 3 distinct models of group work, we considered how mobile and network technologies were used to support students working independently in pairs, collaboratively in asynchronous groups, and collaboratively in synchronous groups. These 3 models characterise distinct strategies for developing fieldwork activities to meet the needs and abilities of a diverse student group with unequal access to field sites.
On the first exercise students examined seaside cliff exposures at Kilkee and worked in pairs to capture and describe examples of sedimentary structures. Each pair then presented their examples to the larger group. In the second exercise, students visited a site near Clifden and over 3 days worked in 3 asynchronous and separated groups collecting orientation measurements and lithologic observations, to produce group reports and create a geological map. For the final exercise, students visited a cliff exposure of glacial till at Renvyle Point and worked in synchronous split groups (i.e. at separate locations, connected by a local WiFi network) to characterize glacial structures and determine ice flow direction.
Contrasting the three learning designs, the synchronous technology-mediated live video link used in the last activity gave the strongest sense of social engagement and group cohesion. However, the asynchronous fieldwork coupled with group presentations in the first activity also developed a sense of engagement and helped establish a peer learning community. Rather than seeking an optimal learning design or technology applicable in all contexts, this study highlighted the benefits of tailoring the learning design and making appropriate use of technology within each field environment to enable all students and staff to achieve their learning objectives.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-303984
© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.