274 D35. Petrology, Igneous (Posters)

Tuesday, 24 October 2017
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Halls 4EF

OXYGEN ISOTOPE COMPOSITIONS OF OLIVINE FROM QUATERNARY MAFIC VENTS OF THE GOLDEN TROUT VOLCANIC FIELD, KERN PLATEAU, CA

Paper number: 274-23
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

The Golden Trout Volcanic Field (GTVF) is a Quaternary volcanic field located at an average elevation of 2,600 m on the Kern Plateau in the southern Sierra Nevada. Approximately 0.04 km3 of olivine-phyric basalt, trachy-basalt, basaltic trachy-andesite, and basaltic andesite magma has erupted from four vents in the GTVF between ~743 and ~55 ka, which corresponds to an average eruption rate of ~0.06 km3/Myr. The number of vents, eruption volume, and eruption rate in the GTVF is orders of magnitude less than contemporaneous and neighboring alkalic and sub-alkalic basaltic volcanic fields like Big Pine and Coso, which exist ~60 km north and ~30 km east, respectively. One possible explanation for the pronounced differences in the evolution of these mafic volcanic fields relates to crustal thickness. Whereas geophysical surveys suggest a Moho depth of ~35 km beneath the GTVF, the Moho beneath the Big Pine and Coso volcanic fields is thought to be only ~25 km deep. Perhaps differences in eruption volume and eruption rate between GTVF and neighboring volcanic fields like Coso and Big Pine occur because rising mafic magma spends more time traveling through thicker crust and ends up stalling out due to density and/or thermal limitations. To test this hypothesis, we measured via laser fluorination δ18O values of olivine phenocrysts from GTVF and compared them to existing δ18O measurements from Big Pine and Coso. Initial results yield higher than mantle δ18O values of 5.88 - 6.52 ‰ from Fo74-88 olivine sampled from Groundhog Cone, the youngest vent in the GTVF. These values are 1 ‰ higher than any Sierran peridotites but agree with high δ18O values obtained previously from older GTVF vents, suggesting a high δ18O mantle source and steady input from assimilated crust over time. Interestingly, GTVF δ18O values are only <1 ‰ higher than those from Big Pine, suggesting a similar mantle source and assimilated input of Sierra Nevada crust despite differences in crustal thickness. Our findings are inconsistent with the idea that differences in eruption volume and eruption rate between GTVF and neighboring volcanic fields are the result of differences in crustal thickness.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-305009

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.