T378 Insights from Microfossils, from Traditional to Novel Approaches (Posters)
Wednesday, 25 October 2017
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Halls 4EF
REASSESSING THE BARTONIAN UNIT STRATOTYPES: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH
Paper number: T378-4
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM
Authors
-
Simonetta MonechiUniversita degli Studi Firenze, Firenze
-
Lucía Rivero-CuestaUniversidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza
-
Gloria FranceschettiUniversit. di Firenze, Firenze
-
Alina IakovlevaRussian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
-
Jerry J. HookerNatural History Museum, London
-
Laia AlegretUniversity of Zaragoza, Zaragoza
-
Jaume Dinares-TurellRoma
-
Stacy YagerBall State University, Muncie, IN
-
Richard H. FluegemanBall State University, Muncie, IN
Abstract
The base of the Bartonian Stage in the type area is defined by the Nummulites prestwichianus bed, which provides a locally distinctive level, however is not widely correlatable outside of the Hampshire basin. Only a single, long-ranged, planktonic foraminifera has been identified, Dipsidripella danvillensis, and so correlation of this bed with planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy has not been possible. The dinoflagellates do show a taxonomic turnover with Rhombodinium draco occurring a few centemeters above the level of the N. prestwichianus bed at several localities in the Hampshire basin, however, this is not consistant outside of this region. Calcareous nannofossils from the site were relatively impoverished, with NP zones being largely recognized by secondary markers. However, Aubry (1983, 1986) recognized Reticulofenestra umbilica, which is a primary marker within the CP zonation, and suggests further correlation potential for calcareous nannoplankton. Palaeomagnetic studies have also been carried out at the Alum bay section; Dawber et al., (2011) identified C18n with the NP16-17 boundary and the Nummulites prestwichianus bed as being within the underlying reversed interval, but there are problems with their interpretation with the nannofossil record.Improvement in the stratigraphy is essential to better define this interval and provide a globally useful datum. In order to resolve this issue, we present a new assessment of the Alum Bay section using integrated smaller and larger benthic foraminiferal, dinoflagellate and nannofossil stratigraphy.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-305810
© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.