T318 Linking Physical and Ecological Processes from Source-to-Sink to Investigate Multi-Scale Response to Restoration

Wednesday, 25 October 2017
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Chelan 5

CONSIDERING SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF FLOODS IN STREAM RESTORATION: EFFECTS OF HYDROCLIMATE ON THE STABILITY OF CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY AND AQUATIC HABITAT

Paper number: T318-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:05 AM – 8:25 AM

Authors

Abstract

A well-established paradigm in fluvial geomorphology is that alluvial rivers are adjusted to the bankfull discharge, which over the long term does the most geomorphic work in terms of the magnitude and frequency of flows (Wolman and Miller, 1960). As such, the bankfull discharge (typically the 2-year flood) is commonly used as an index value for creating or maintaining desired channel types and associated aquatic habitats in stream restoration efforts. While it is broadly recognized that the entire hydrograph (not simply the bankfull flow) is needed to maintain physical and ecological function of rivers, few restoration efforts consider the stability of channel morphology and aquatic habitat in terms of the spatial and temporal variability of floods. Here, a framework is presented for examining this issue as a function of hydroclimate (snowmelt, frontal rainfall, and thunderstorm/monsoonal environments). Regime diagrams are used to predict channel characteristics (depth, grain size, slope), reach morphology (pool-riffle, plane-bed, etc.), and streambed scour as functions of discharge and bedload sediment supply. Coupled with digital elevation models, predictions are extrapolated to watershed scales. As expected, results show that physical and biological conditions are less stable and more variable as one moves from snowmelt to monsoonal hydroclimates, but responses are spatially variable at watershed scales (modulated by process domains and the degree of channel confinement). In most cases, flood variation creates a disturbance regime that is expressed as variation about a mean, quasi-stable morphology, but in some cases, channels may alternate between different reach types, exhibiting a greater degree of disturbance (i.e., state changes). Formal inclusion of spatial and temporal variability in our representation of fluvial processes, biophysical condition, and restoration design is advocated, and is central to assessing the potential effects of human disturbance (dams, diversion, land use, climate change) on riverine ecosystems.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-306938

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.