T244 Geomorphology and Landscape Evolution of Mars: The G.K. Gilbert Award Session I
Tuesday, 24 October 2017
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Tahoma 1
CRATER DENSITIES ON LOWER MOUNT SHARP AS A PROXY FOR MODERN GEOLOGIC EROSION
Paper number: T244-9
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 3:35 PM – 3:50 PM
Authors
-
Mackenzie D. DayUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA
-
Horton NewsomUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Abstract
Our methodological assumptions are that craters with a diameter <=250 m this small are retained on small geologic units (<10000 km2) and the ability to erode craters this size takes less than one billion years. We calculate crater density by converting craters to points and measure that point density over a 200 m radius circle. Errors due to larger craters erasing smaller craters are ignored. Exhumed craters, of which we know there are a few, are also ignored, so our densities values may be overestimated.
Crater densities are several factors lower on ‘lower’ Mt. Sharp compared to Bradbury Rise. The Murray Formation from the Bradbury Rise edge up to Vera Rubin Ridge (VRR, i.e. ‘Hematite Ridge’) is almost devoid of craters. VRR has low to moderate crater density. The clay unit south of VRR is nearly craterless like the Murray. The ‘fan’ unit has similar crater density compared to the (VRR. The highest densities occur on some mounds/mesas farther up section as well as on a similar ‘fan’ unit west of VRR.
Decreases in crater density could be from increased eolian erosion as ‘lower’ Mt. Sharp is at minimum 100 m higher than Bradbury Rise, though the decreased density is not gradual and some of the highest values occur at higher elevations. Crater densities also mirror previously defined geologic units, thereby pointing to induration as the dominant factor in retention. From the crater density values, we conclude that the Murray and clay units are eroding faster than VRR and the upper sulfate units due to increased induration, which may reflect how they were deposited or post-depositional fluid flow emplacing cements.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-307155
© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.