T333 Geoscience and the Law: Exploring the Legal and Ethical Issues of Geologic Research and Practice

Wednesday, 25 October 2017
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 611

WHOSE FAULT IS IT? PROBABLY NO ONE’S

Paper number: T333-1
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:30 PM – 1:45 PM

Authors

Abstract

There are long-standing, though variable by state, regulatory standards for permitting, operation, and testing of oil and gas wells, wastewater injection wells, and drinking water wells. The presence or absence of sensitive water supplies, aquifers, and underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) may define permissible locations or depths for wells. During permitting there is often an open period for public opposition and an administrative hearing process if opposing points and arguments are brought against a permit application. Most of these measures are intended to protect drinking water resources, and geologic knowledge is invaluable to avoiding or resolving the source or cleanup of contamination.

However, now there are emerging legal issues that require geologic expertise and present ethical challenges to geoscientists. Because industrial activity is occurring in new or dormant regions, new permits might be denied based on a perceived threat or previously issued permits may be adjusted, suspended, or revoked because of an adverse event. Increases in noise or dust pollution, road traffic, or seismic hazard are some of the perceived or apparent adverse effects influencing permitting and operation. Seismic events have also resulted in legal action against various operators, but cause and effect are not straightforward because of a complicated set of 4D geologic and other factors. A preponderance of geologic research might support one of the parties in a case, but limitations and uncertainties are often not defined for published work. Without proper quality assurance and quality control, it becomes difficult to quantify hazard or risk and further translate to legal liabilities. Some of these challenges will be explored to strive toward ethical, responsible, and scientifically defensible geological research and practice.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-307290

© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.