15 Undergraduate Research Poster Session II (Posters)
Monday, 16 April 2018
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
First Floor Lobby
EXPLORING METHODS TO DETERMINE THE STRAIN ELLIPSOID IN DUNITES TO PROVIDE CONTEXT FOR EBSD CPO PATTERNS
Paper number: 15-3
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Ginny PetersonGrand Valley State University, Allendale, MI
Abstract
We have used a published method for calculating the vorticity axis (CVA) from EBSD data. Assuming the CVA is parallel to the Y-axis of strain for non-coaxial deformation, axial D-type fabrics seem likely for most samples. To properly orient and make sense of the CPO patterns we have explored methods for measuring the 3D olivine shape fabrics. An ellipsoid can be calculated by determining the strain ellipses for 3 orthogonal thin sections.
Two approaches for 2D measurement of the strain ellipse were tested for accuracy and repeatability. Both relied on use of high resolution thin section photo scans while simultaneously observing the grains in thin section to confirm grain boundaries. The simpler center-to-center method, employed by manually selecting center points of individual olivine grains was tested with multiple observers and a varied number of center picks. Fry plots created using the program EllipseFit resulted in poor and inconsistent ellipses. A more productive approach has been to select the best-fit ellipses for multiple individual olivine grains. Most grains in an area were selected, excluding those that were small or not clearly a single grain. With this approach EllipseFit can produced a repeatable strain ellipse from multiple observers. Thin section quality and alteration effects influence the strength of the ellipses. EllipseFit was used to calculate the shape fabric/strain ellipsoid from the 3 perpendicular slides and we have been able to use this shape fabric to reorient our CPO data. We are in the process of testing this approach with other samples and increasing the numbers of ellipse picks in some slides to confirm the feasibility of this method.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 4
doi: 10.1130/abs/2018NC-311977
© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.