24 Morphology and Evolutionary Trends
Friday, 13 April 2018
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 301 B
ASSESSING OLD AND NEW DATA TO DIGITALLY RECONSTRUCT MORPHOLOGY
Paper number: 24-2
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 8:20 AM – 8:40 AM
Authors
-
Jennifer E. BauerThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
-
Colin SumrallUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Abstract
Acetate peels were created in the 1960s by A. Breimer and are reposited at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, Netherlands. Methodology to reconstruct the internal anatomy from scanned acetate peels was developed by collaborators at Appalachian State University and requires a program to render vectors into 3-D; in this study, we use Rhinoceros. For our synchrotron data, the internal anatomy was reconstructed using SPIERS. Here, the same species is reconstructed with each method to assess the major similarities and differences between the internal anatomical models. While both methods provided similar anatomical models, primary differences lie within the automatically generated external model with the synchrotron dataset. Additionally, both methods were time-consuming, however, reconstruction via SPIERS proved to be more time-efficient than the manual tracing and 3-D rendering in Rhinoceros.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 3
doi: 10.1130/abs/2018SE-312131
© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.