10 Assessing Groundwater in the Midwestern U.S.: How Much, How Good, and for How Long? (Posters)

Monday, 16 April 2018
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
First Floor Lobby

QUANTIFYING SURFACE WATER-GROUND WATER EXCHANGE USING TEMPERATURE PROFILE INVERSE MODELING IN A RIPARIAN WETLAND

Paper number: 10-2
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 5:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

Second Creek is wild rice stream located on the Iron Range in northeast Minnesota that has been impacted by mining pollution. In order to understand how mining-derived sulfate affects biogeochemical cycling at Second Creek, surface water-ground water exchange must be quantified, because it controls geochemical gradients in the sediment. We employed inverse modeling of temperature profiles to estimate hyporheic flux at the site. Temperature profile methods have been most widely applied in streambeds with sediments that are sand-size and greater and support relatively high flux magnitudes. In contrast, the Second Creek study site is a riparian wetland where low hyporheic flux is expected due to high organic content in the sediments.

Streambed temperature profiles were measured continuously over the summer of 2016 at three locations across a transect spanning from the main stream channel to the flanking wetland area. The data were collected using low-cost, open-source vertical temperature profilers and “ALog” data loggers. The USGS model 1DTempPro was applied to the temperature data, along with co-located head data, at each location to estimate hydraulic conductivity across the transect. The sediment thermal parameters used in the model were constrained based on the sediment bulk density, which is strongly controlled by organic content. The estimated hydraulic conductivity values were applied to the measured head gradients to generate time series of hyporheic flux time across the transect over the summer. Results showed spatial variability in both hydraulic properties and hyporheic flux. Across the transect, flux was upward toward the surface water for nearly the entire summer, though the magnitude of the flux varied dynamically in response to variable weather conditions and one flux reversal occurred following a strong late-summer storm event.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 4

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018NC-312470

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.