4 Neontological Approaches to Paleontological Questions

Thursday, 12 April 2018
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 301 B

CLAMS, WHELKS, AMPHIPODS, AND SHOREBIRDS: A NEOICHNOLOGICAL LOVE STORY

Paper number: 4-5
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 9:20 AM – 9:40 AM

Authors

Abstract

Neoichnology – the study of modern traces – is a wellspring of information for paleontologists seeking modern analogs of fossil behavior. However, modern trace assemblages showing behavioral interactions and responses between four or more species are relatively rare, let alone applicable to reconstructing local food webs. Therefore, I am pleased to share an example of how modern traces of intertidal bivalves, gastropods, and shorebirds from Jekyll Island (Georgia) can demonstrate such interactions while providing models for similar trace fossil assemblages.

The cast of trace-making characters are: dwarf surf clams (Mulinia lateralis); knobbed whelks (Busycon carica); amphipods (Acanthohaustorius spp.); sanderlings (Calidris alba); and laughing gulls (Leucophaeus altricilla). The chain of events connecting these species was started by the whelks, which buried themselves in saturated sands of a newly emergent intertidal zone. This burying liquefied sands around the large gastropods, which better allowed dwarf surf clams to burrow into these disturbed zones. Unfortunately for the clams, but fortunately for the sanderlings, this sedimentary situation concentrated them in visually prominent patches, which attracted roaming packs of sanderlings. Abundant beak-probe traces, vacant bivalve-shaped holes, and tracks around whelks attested to intense mining of the shallowly burrowed clams. Some whelk resting traces, though, lacked whelks. In these instances, laughing gulls further aided sanderling feeding. According to closely associated traces, gulls pried and pulled whelks from their hiding places to feed on them. These actions exposed infaunal amphipods underneath and around the whelks, which again attracted sanderlings, leading to dense concentrations of their beak-probe traces and tracks in and around whelk resting traces. In summary, trace fossils of similarly complicated relationships may be difficult to interpret at first, but are more likely clarified through neoichnology.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 3

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018SE-312645

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.