18 D7. Stratigraphy, Sedimentation, and Diagenesis (Posters)
Thursday, 12 April 2018
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 301 DE/Henley Concourse
PETROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF SEDIMENTARY INTERBEDS OF THE CATOCTIN FORMATION IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
Paper number: 18-6
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:30 PM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Michael SmithUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC
Abstract
Preliminary examination of the seven samples reveals two groups of clastic rocks. The stratigraphically lower group (4 samples) are mostly tan, beige and pink in color, clast or grain supported and finely bedded at the base but more massive toward the upper contact. The minerals (quartz, alkali and plagioclase feldspar, opaque minerals, tourmaline, zircon) are angular to subrounded and fine to medium grained. Some of the feldspars exhibit exsolution, as well as argillite (clay mineral) alteration. Quartz + feldspar rock fragments (0.5 to 0.75 mm) are common. Hematite staining may be related to weathering of the opaque minerals. Based upon the mineral composition and grain size, these rocks are an arkosic sandstone.
The other group, which is stratigraphically above the arkosic sandstone, appears to be the contact zone with the overlying Catoctin Formation metabasalts. This rock ranges in color from dark green and maroon with angular to subangular clasts that are largely matrix supported. These samples are primarily composed of metabasalt rock fragments (chlorite, epidote, plagioclase feldspar) and matrix material (opaque minerals, feldspar, little quartz). These metabasalt rock fragments (0.7 to 20 mm) are much coarser grained than the arkosic sandstone. Some feldspars show exsolution as well as sericite (white mica) alteration. Most of the mineral grains are subangular and the rock may be a breccia, possibly related to either fracturing or faulting found in the area. Much of the quartz is secondary in the form of a fracture or vein fill. These rocks have more opaque minerals, metabasalt rock fragments and less quartz, suggesting that their provenance is different from the arkosic sandstone.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 3
doi: 10.1130/abs/2018SE-312950
© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.