18 D7. Stratigraphy, Sedimentation, and Diagenesis (Posters)

Thursday, 12 April 2018
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 301 DE/Henley Concourse

A SWASH-BUILT BEACHROCK-INFLUENCED CARBONATE BERM SYSTEM: EVIDENCE OF MICROTIDAL LOW AMPLITUDE BARS?

Paper number: 18-10
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:30 PM – 5:30 PM

Authors

  • Clay D. Harris Presenting Author
    Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN

Abstract

A shallowing-upward shoreline deposit in the Lower Carters Limestone (Upper Ordovician, Nashville Dome) formed on an isolated, wave-dominated, storm-influenced carbonate strandplain. A repeated facies association of interbedded, grainstone-packstone (50-70 cm thick) and dolostone (~20 cm thick), located near the top of the deposit, is interpreted to indicate stacking of high intertidal berm and swash pool couplets. Berms typically form by shoreward migration of slip-face bars, producing a telltale, landward-dipping, steep cross-lamination on the lee side of the bar crest. Upper Carters’ berm sands exhibit only very low angle (1-2o) to horizontal, parallel laminations. Intertidal ridge-and-runnel (aka low amplitude) bar systems may produce this type of berm deposit (i.e. lacking slip-face cross-lamination). However, RRB involve specific conditions of tidal range, fetch, sediment size and beach slope, in particular, meso- to macrotidal conditions. Three postulates therefore merit consideration: 1) these are not intertidal RRB deposits; 2) this is (at least) a low mesotidal setting; 3) under specific forcing conditions, RRB's may form in microtidal settings. Based on the totality of associated sedimentological evidence, formation via intertidal RRB’s is likely a “best-fit” model for these berm deposits, contradicting postulate #1. Strong supporting evidence for postulate #2 is lacking, although the Upper Carters Ls does host a (?microtidal) tidal flat system. Concerning postulate #3, beachrock deposits and hardgrounds may have affected morphodynamic feedback, resulting in non-parametric boundary conditions. These include reducing swash infiltration and sediment availability, and enhancing wave dynamics and sediment transport. Therefore, postulate #3 may be the most parsimonious scenario.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 3

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018SE-313064

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.