27 Collaborative Learning in Geoscience Classrooms and Labs: Examples, Demonstrations, Best Practices, and Assessment
Tuesday, 17 April 2018
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 299
LEVERAGING PLANETARY ROVERS AS ROBOTIC GEOLOGISTS TO TEACH ABOUT EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES IN THE K-12 CLASSROOM: A MODULE INCLUDING PORTABLE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY
Paper number: 27-9
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 10:35 AM – 10:55 AM
Authors
-
Jeanne M. FrommUniversity of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD
Abstract
It is easy to make the case in the K-12 classroom for planetary rovers in general, and Curiosity specifically, to be viewed as “robotic geologists”. After all, the close-up camera on Curiosity was named to reflect this connection, the Mars Hand Lens Imager, equating the camera to one of the basic field tools carried by every geologist. We describe the relationships between other Curiosity instruments and those utilized in geology labs (e.g., X-ray diffraction and ChemMin). While we use the term “robotic geologist”, we also emphasize that Curiosity collects data, but human geologists are necessary to analyze and interpret the data.
Our module has three main elements:
(1) Students are introduced to the principle of uniformitarianism, and then they examine analog rock samples paired with actual photos taken by rovers of the geology of Mars.
(2) Students are introduced to how X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) works at a level consistent with their understanding of chemistry, and given chemical criteria for distinguishing “Earth-like” (MORB), “Mars-like” (alkali basalt), and “Moon-like” (FeTi basalt), and then they actively participate in a portable XRF demonstration using qualitative analysis of three analog basalt lava samples to recognize what composition type each belongs to.
(3) To further utilize a strength of portable XRF to address a kind of problem the public commonly brings to geologists, we also have them examine two samples that look like iron meteorite candidates, and then analyze them to see which is a meteorite (with a significant Ni peak) and which is a pseudo-meteorite or “meteorwrong” (no Ni peak).
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 4
doi: 10.1130/abs/2018NC-313126
© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.