38 Understanding Water Resources related to Mineralized Uranium Deposits in the Southwestern United States (Posters)

Wednesday, 16 May 2018
8:30 AM - 6:30 PM
Outdoor Tents

MINERALOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SOLUTION MINING OF URANIUM IN NEW MEXICAN DEPOSITS

Paper number: 38-2
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 8:30 AM – 6:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

In a volatile uranium market, it is essential to have as thorough an understanding of a deposit as possible. This, on a fundamental level, is the mineralogical makeup of the ore and gangue. Solution mining for uranium (compared to processes where the ore is excavated) is a subtle process where the deposit mineralogy may confound leaching efforts. Also, in-situ leaching processes may liberate environmentally hazardous metals (e.g., molybdenum) into groundwater. These considerations are largely determined by the deposit’s inherent geochemistry. Despite this, there are some significant deposits which have little known of their mineralogy, but well-constrained structure and lithology.

In light of this, we evaluated the mineralogical makeup of material from two deposits within the Grants Uranium Region in northwestern New Mexico. The samples encompass two distinct systems in the Jurassic Morrison Formation: the primary (tabular-type) St. Anthony deposit, and redistributed-type Borrego Pass deposit. Methods included X-ray powder diffraction, thin section microscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and electron microprobe analysis.

Generally, uranium mineralization in the samples is interstitial to feldspathic sandstones. The St. Anthony samples’ uranium was predominantly in the form of organo-uranium complexes, also containing uraninite, various uranyl sulfates, phosphates and vanadates. Though higher organic matter content (as encountered in tabular-type uranium deposits) may prevent the adequate recovery of uranium under most leaching methods, significant amounts of uranium were historically extracted from unaugmented mine water in deposits north of St. Anthony. The Borrego Pass samples were lower in organic matter and higher in uraninite, which is readily available to typical in-situ leach lixiviants. The Borrego Pass deposit resources (approximately 8 million lbs uranium oxide), though never exploited, were considered for in-situ recovery in the 1980s.

This study is a stepping stone to comprehensive kinetic studies which link behavior under leaching conditions to mineralogy.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018RM-314333

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.