T82 Declining Enrollments in U.S. Undergraduate Geoscience Programs: How Did We Get Here and How Do We Get Our Groove Back?

Monday, 5 November 2018
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 234

WHY I CLOSED MY GEOSCIENCE DEPARTMENT AND WHAT YOU CAN DO TO KEEP IT FROM HAPPENING TO YOURS

Paper number: T82-6
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:20 AM – 9:40 AM

Authors

  • Carl Drummond Presenting Author
    Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN

Abstract

On December 31, 2016 the Department of Geosciences at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW) was closed. Additionally, on that date admissions to the Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Arts in Geology degree programs were suspended. As the chief academic officer of the institution, these decisions fell to me to implement. The fact that for the past twenty-three years I had been a member of the Geosciences Department made doing so both ironic and extraordinarily difficult.

Because of its significant service function, the department experienced changes in credit hour production that were closely aligned with enrollment patterns experienced by IPFW. The university reached a maximum in undergraduate enrollment in 2010, immediately following the Great Recession. Since the fall of 2011 the campus experienced a steady decline in enrolled headcount. Likewise, the department experienced a decline in instructional credit hours beginning in 2012. In response to declining enrollment, during the summer and early fall of 2014, a university task force of 12 faculty and 12 staff members reviewed university systems and processes and developed an assessment process that came to be known as the University Strategic Alignment Process (USAP).

In response to the USAP process, I released a report that recommended the department focus on modifying the curriculum of the BS in Geology program, in collaboration with civil engineering, to create a highly applied geotechnical undergraduate experience. Additionally, I noted that program elimination would be a natural outcome of faculty attrition if growth did not occur.

What could have been done to change this outcome? The department never developed strong relationships with potential local or regional employers of geology graduates. The department failed to utilize personnel transitions to recast its curricular emphasis towards geotechnical education. There was great reluctance to develop client relationships with a growing civil engineering program. The department failed to recognize declining enrollments and a change in academic budgeting would shift emphasis from number of credit hours taught to number of majors and degrees conferred. As such, when university’s post-recessionary contraction worsened, the department and its programs became expendable.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-315803

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.