T201 Cultural Geology and Heritage Stone: Use, Petrology, Quarrying, Engineering Properties, and Other Aspects of Stone Used for Buildings, Monuments, Sculpture, or Otherwise Relating to the Interface of Stone with Human Culture Past and Present

Tuesday, 6 November 2018
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 133

NERO DI COLONNATA (“BLACK CARRARA MARBLE”): PETROGRAPHIC AND STABLE ISOTOPE COMPARISONS WITH FAMOUS WHITE CARRARA MARBLE AND ONE CHINESE IMPORT

Paper number: T201-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 3:05 PM – 3:20 PM

Authors

Abstract

Carrara marble was formed by Tertiary metamorphism of Triassic to Early Jurassic limestones, and has been quarried from the Colonnata, Miseglia and Torano valleys in the Apuan Alps, near the town of Carrara in Tuscany, Italy since Roman times. This marble is used extensively for architectural and decorative purposes, and its finest white variety is highly prized as statuary stone. Michelangelo’s “David,” for example, was made of Carrara statuario. Consequently, White Carrara marble is one of the best known and most famous stones in the world.

Less is known, however, about associated, but rarer Nero di Colonnata (“Black Carrara marble”), quarried in the Colonnata Valley and used locally as a popular building and decorative stone in part due to its visual contrast with White Carrara. In the 20th century Nero was also used for some sculptures (e.g., “Cavallino” by Arturo Dazzi, at the Fine Arts Academy in Carrara). Petrographically it is recrystallized peloidal packstone to grainstone with a very different texture from mosaics of calcite crystals found in typical marble.

Stable isotope study included a comparison with white, including statuario, and gray (bardiglio) marbles from 7 quarries from all three valleys in the Carrara region. Their carbon isotope values cluster around 2 ‰ VPDB, and most of their oxygen isotope values range between -2 and -8 ‰ VPDB, with some samples reaching -15 ‰. Some samples of Nero di Colonnata (δ18O = -2.7 to -6.9 ‰ and δ13C around 2 ‰), overlap with the Carrara marble, likely indicating similarities in their protoliths, but other samples have δ13C values as high as 5.2 ‰, forming a distinct compositional field that reflects differences in levels of recrystallization between these black limestones vs true marbles.

Comparison also was made with one example of Chinese “black marble,” obtained from a local studio in Carrara and presumably imported as a less expensive and more abundant option than the local black stones. Isotopic composition (δ13C = 3.4 ‰; δ18O = -6.4 ‰) of this fine grained fossiliferous (foraminifera and echinoderms) wackestone to packstone of unknown age and location, is completely different from the local Carrara examples. This allows for easy petrographic and geochemical distinction between these stones and demonstrates the usefulness of these techniques for their characterization.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-316505

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.