33 Undergraduate Research (Posters)
Thursday, 4 April 2002
1:00 PM - 5:00 PM
FIELD AND GEOCHEMICAL COMPARISON OF THE WEBSTER-ADDIE AND BALSAM GAP ULTRAMAFIC BODIES, EASTERN BLUE RIDGE, NORTH CAROLINA
Paper number: 33-19
Program: THEME SESSIONS
Time: 1:00 PM – 5:00 PM
Authors
-
Clayton LoehnWCU-USF, Tampa, FL
-
Bryan AllisonWCU-USF, Tampa, FL
-
Jonathan NewbyWCU-USF, Tampa, FL
-
Jeffrey G. RyanUniv of South Florida, Tampa, FL
-
Virginia L. PetersonWestern Carolina Univ, Cullowhee, NC
-
Steven YurkovichWestern Carolina Univ, Cullowhee, NC
-
Jonathan BurrWestern Carolina Univ, Cullowhee, NC
-
Sarah KruseUniv of South Florida, Tampa, FL
Abstract
WA and BG are characterized by very similar major and trace element geochemistry. DCP analyses show primarily MgO and SiO2 with minor amounts of FeO and CrO. The slightly higher CaO and Al2O3 abundances in the WA rocks reflect its greater abundance of cpx. There are no clear geochemical or physical connections between the amphibolites and ultramafic rocks. The amphibolite compositions are inconsistent with interpretation as mafic cumulate compositions. Geochemistry of the ultramafic rocks is more suggestive of residual mantle assemblages (i.e., they have high Ni, Cr, and low Sr, Ba). The nearly identical major and trace element chemistries are consistent with a similar source for the two bodies. While our data for key trace elements is currently limited, flat to U-shaped REE patterns point to a more LREE-enriched source region. Such signatures are typical of metasomatized ultramafic rocks (Frey and McDonough 1988). The source of these metasomatizing fluids may be from the tonalites and pegmatites that cut through the ultramafic bodies.