T89 Magmas Assemble! Petrologic, Geochemical, Chronologic, and Geophysical Insights into the Architecture and Timescales of Magmatic Systems

Monday, 5 November 2018
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 240-241

AGE OF ZIRCON: WHAT IS REALLY BEING RECORDED IN INTERMEDIATE-TO-SILICIC ARC VOLCANIC ROCKS?

Paper number: T89-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 9:15 AM

Authors

Abstract

Zircon are frequently found in intermediate-to-silicic arc volcanic rocks, even when zircon saturation suggests it is not crystallizing. There are a variety of zircon sources in arc volcanoes: crystallizing in active melt, inclusions in phenocrysts, crystal mush from antecedent magma or foreign cumulates and xenoliths. Each represent a different episode of the erupted magma’s evolution. Here we use temporal and composition data from zircon and zircon-hosted melt inclusions from the Cascade Range to understand the evolution of intermediate-to-silicic arc magma and what zircon is and isn’t recording.

The Lassen Volcanic Center (LVC), Mt. Hood, Mount St. Helens, Crater Lake, Medicine Lake and South Sister all contain zircon that predate the eruption age by 103-105years. Hood and St. Helens contain zircon that may have crystallized within error of the eruption age of the host lava. LVC and Hood zircon Hf, Eu/Eu* and Yb/Gd composition varies over time, reflecting changing magmatic t-xconditions, and exhibits compositional clustering that represents different crystallization conditions. However, considering the uncertainty of the analyses, interpretation of zircon U-Th age-compositional trends can be difficult (Kent and Cooper, 2017).

Zircon-hosted melt inclusions and adhered glass from the LVC are high-silica rhyolite, frequently exceeding the silica content of their host. The lone exception is zircon from the Rockland tephra, the only known large-volume explosive eruption from the LVC, where melt inclusion composition match the host magma. This implies that zircon is forming in a fractionated, cooling crystal mush that is zircon saturated. This mush (and host melt) may be sampled during the last stages before an eruption.

The zircon data suggests that intermediate-to-silicic arc magma is an amalgam of rhyolitic melt + mafic melt + intermediate phenocrysts + silicic antecrysts. In some cases, the rhyolitic mush behaves as a filter (e.g, Hood, Kent et al., 2010) creating uniform hybrid andesite. In others, it mingles with intruding magma (e.g., LVC, Klemetti and Clynne, 2014) creating abundant quenched inclusions. Zircon record evidence of high-silica mush during periods of active eruption and relative volcanic quiescence and its small size allows it to be readily transported and erupted.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-317396

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.