T203 Advances in Agrohydrology: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Water Resources, Land Management, and Food Systems

Tuesday, 6 November 2018
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 138-139

POTENTIAL INFLUENCE OF DRAINAGE WATER RECYCLING ON CROP YIELD, STREAMFLOW, AND WATER QUALITY IN INDIANA

Paper number: T203-12
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:15 PM – 4:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

Subsurface tile drainage systems are essential to productive agriculture in low-gradient regions with poorly drained soils, but water drained from these landscapes carries dissolved nutrients (e.g. nitrate) which contribute to downstream hypoxic conditions. Indiana is one of the top four states in terms of subsurface drainage extent, approximately 42% (5.6 million acres) of all cropland has subsurface drainage and only 3% (<500,000 acres) of all cropland is irrigated. Drainage water recycling (DWR) is a water conservation practice in which subsurface drainage is stored on site in a pond, reservoir, or ditch to be used as a source for supplemental irrigation during periods of water deficit. This study investigates how wide spread adoption of DWR could influence streamflow, water quality and crop yields in a traditionally drained and rain-fed agriculture system. The Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model, with a subsurface drainage algorithm, coupled with the Cropping Systems Simulation Model (CropSyst) dynamic crop growth model is used to simulate corn and soybean yields and hydrology across the state of Indiana from 1984 to 2013. Simulated subsurface drainage is evaluated using observed drainflow from five field sites. Simulated routed streamflow is evaluated using observed streamflow from eight watersheds ranging from 476 to 12,265 mi2. The VIC-CropSyst model is calibrated using observed county-level yields (2004 - 2013) and state average irrigated yields reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service. Two scenarios are simulated, one with conventional drainage and the other with DWR adopted in all areas with subsurface drainage where 1% of the drained area is retired from crop production and used as a storage pond. The differences in simulated corn and soy crop yield, annual volume of captured drainflow (load reduction) and streamflow patterns between the two scenarios for eight large watersheds across Indiana will be presented.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-318412

© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.