T214 Phylogenetic Paleoecology; Macroecology within an Evolutionary Framework
Tuesday, 6 November 2018
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 142
USING PHYLOGENETIC TREES AND 3D MORPHOMETRICS TO UNDERSTAND ECOLOGICAL CHANGE DURING THE LATE ORDOVICIAN MASS EXTINCTION AND RECOVERY
Paper number: T214-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:00 PM – 2:15 PM
Authors
-
Curtis CongreveNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
-
Max ChristieUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL
-
Audrey BourneThe Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA
-
Caroline GazzeThe Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA
-
Brooke RoselleThe Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA
-
Mark PatzkowskyState College, PA
Abstract
For this project, we collected 3D morphological data from strophomenid brachiopods using the photogrammetry method Structure-from-Motion (SfM). This method creates a high-resolution 3D image from a series of overlapping 2D photographs. It has been used in other fields of geology, but has not yet been widely applied to paleontology. Unlike more complicated 3D techniques (e.g., CT scanning, laser scanning), SfM can be performed with photographs from any digital camera. This advantage makes SfM simple, inexpensive, and field-accessible, which is ideal for fossil organisms. Its simplicity and wide-applicability mean SfM can generate large datasets for robust statistical analysis of morphology. This sort of 3D data is particularly valuable for quantifying shell features (e.g., globosity, ribbing, texture) that can only be accurately captured in 3D.
We tested this method on well-preserved brachiopods from the Yale Peabody Museum and demonstrated that SfM can robustly resolve important external morphological characters in 3D. Preliminary results comparing these data to our previous phylogenetic character data illustrate the importance of considering historical components of geometric morphometric analyses across extinction and recovery events. The success of this method in the lab has motivated a field project to quantify change in brachiopod morphology within a stratigraphic section. This will allow us to place morphologic data in both a phylogenetic and stratigraphic context to better understand the relationship between phylogenetics and paleoecology.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-318636
© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.