T203 Advances in Agrohydrology: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Water Resources, Land Management, and Food Systems
Tuesday, 6 November 2018
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Room 138-139
QUANTIFYING NUTRIENT EXPORT FROM AN UPLAND, INTERMITTENT STREAM DRAINING A WORKING FARM, MADISON COUNTY, KENTUCKY: PRELUDE TO NUTRIENT MITIGATION
Paper number: T203-14
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:45 PM – 5:00 PM
Authors
-
Jonathan M. MalzoneMilford, PA
-
James S. WinterEastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY
-
Ryan M. PennEastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY
-
Reid E. BuskirkEastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY
Abstract
We have constructed an instrumented weir near the mouth of this intermittent stream to measure its discharge over time during both low-water and high-water conditions. We use an autosampler to collect water samples during runoff events and measure nutrients using ion chromatography and colorimetric techniques. A weather station that is part of the Kentucky Mesonet system records rainfall directly at the watershed.
Between runoff events, background or baseflow concentrations of nutrients are generally low, usually much less than 1 mg/L for all nutrient species. Nutrient levels during rain events are generally higher by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude, demonstrating that the preponderance of nutrient export occurs under rainy conditions. Storm events vary widely in total volume from ~68,000 to 8 million liters with most discharge events at 105 L. Nutrient export also varies significantly with the highest values at 1 kg of N as ammonium; 5.3 kg of N as nitrate, and 3.1 kg of P as dissolved orthophosphate.
The quantitative relationship between rainfall amount and the magnitude of nutrient export is problematical, although export generally increases as rainfall increases. Confounding variables include rainfall intensity, rainfall periodicity, pasture rotation, and manure applications. Our present estimates precede nutrient sequestration efforts at the Farm. Nutrient export values before and after sequestration measures are deployed can then compared to test mitigation efficacy.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-319776
© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.