T43 Impact Cratering: Geologic, Geochemical, and Geophysical Signatures on the Terrestrial Planets (Posters)
Sunday, 4 November 2018
9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Halls J-K
DETRITAL SHOCKED ZIRCON PROVIDES FIRST RADIOMETRIC AGE CONSTRAINT OF <1472 MA FOR THE SANTA FE IMPACT STRUCTURE, NEW MEXICO, USA
Paper number: T43-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Aaron J. CavosieCurtin University, Perth
-
Christopher L. KirklandCurtin University, Perth
-
Noreen J. EvansCurtin University, Perth
-
Bradley J. McDonaldCurtin University, Perth
-
Cristina TalaveraUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
-
Timmons M. EricksonARES division, Houston, TX
-
Cristina Lugo CentenoSyracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Abstract
A total of 6619 grains from fifteen sediment samples and two rock samples were surveyed; seven shocked grains were identified (7/6619 = 0.1%). One shocked zircon was identified in a biotite schist shatter cone. Five of seven shocked zircon grains were EBSD mapped; three were analyzed with multiple SIMS spots. EBSD mapping revealed {112} deformation twin lamellae in each of the five zircon grains. U-Pb geochronology for three of the shocked zircon grains yield crystallization ages from 1715±22 to 1472±35 Ma. LA-ICPMS U-Th-Pb analysis of detrital zircon grains from five samples yielded Paleoproterozoic (1800-1600 Ma) and Mesoproterozoic (1500-1300 Ma) ages.
We reveal the first confirmed shocked zircon at the Santa Fe structure. Zircon is the third shocked mineral identified at this site, in addition to xenotime and quartz [9,10]; the {112} twin lamellae indicate that exposed bedrock may have experienced shock pressures up to ~20 GPa [10]. The 1472±35 Ma age determined from a shock-twinned zircon is the first reliable maximum impact age constraint based on analysis of shocked material and extends the window for the Santa Fe impact event into the Mesoproterozoic [11].
References: [1] Fackelman et al. (2008) EPSL, 2017, 290-299, [2] Moser et al. (2011) Can. Jour. Earth Sci., 48, 117-139, [3] Erickson et al. (2013) Am. Min., 98, 59-65, [4] Montalvo et al. (2017) Am. Min., 102, 813-823 [5] Thomson et al. (2014) GSA Bull., 126, 720-730, [6] Erickson et al. (2017) Cont. Min. Pet., 176, 6, [7] Cavosie et al. (2015) Geo., 43, 315-318, [8] Timms et al. (2012) Met. Plan. Sci., 47, 120-141, [9] Cavosie et al. (2016) Geo., 44, 803-806, [10] Montalvo et al. 2018, GSA Bull., in press.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-320381
© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.