T83 Making Sense of Methodologies and Theoretical Frameworks in Geoscience Education Research
Monday, 5 November 2018
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Room 235
THEORIES AND MODELS IN SCALAR THINKING RESEARCH
Paper number: T83-12
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 11:00 AM – 11:15 AM
Authors
-
Thomas CliffordUniversity of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder
Abstract
To help fill this gap in knowledge, we conducted a study to examine existing studies on scalar thinking. The initial theoretical framework for this study is Newcombe and Shipley’s typology for spatial thinking (2015), which we apply to scalar thinking. We used the integrative literature review methodology (Torraco, 2005). The data collected are peer-reviewed journal articles published in the English language found using the online databases Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), JSTOR, ProQuest, PubMed, and Web of Science with different combinations of search terms. The articles are examined using textual content analysis, which also forms the basis for iterative rubric development based on themes found in the examined literature.
The online searches yielded 2,140 articles. Of these, 77 articles met the initial inclusion criteria and, at the time of writing this abstract, 37 of these articles were analyzed by a single rater. Of these, 30% were independently coded by a second rater. Comparisons of independent coding results yielded an initial interrater agreement of 91%. Subsequent discussion of discrepant codes resulted in 100% inter-rater agreement. In this presentation, we report our findings about the types of theories and models used as theoretical frameworks in research studies about scalar thinking. These theories and models can be used by others to inform empirical research on scalar thinking.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 50, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2018AM-320792
© Copyright 2018 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.